Petition Against Zero Subsidy for PhilHealth Filed Before Supreme Court

- Advertisement -

A petition questioning the legality of the zero subsidy for the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) under the 2025 national budget was filed before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, February 25.

Health reform advocate Dr. Tony Leachon filed the petition for certiorari and prohibition, challenging the government’s decision not to allocate any subsidy for the state health insurer.

- Advertisement -

Named as respondents in the petition are House Speaker Martin Romualdez, Senate President Francis “Chiz” Escudero, and Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin.

In his petition, Dr. Leachon urged the Supreme Court to issue a temporary restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction to halt the implementation of the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA) concerning the zero subsidy for PhilHealth.

He also requested the Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the relevant government agencies to immediately allocate and release the necessary funds for PhilHealth, in accordance with the Universal Health Care Act and the 1987 Constitution.

Dr. Leachon explained that the petition was filed because the lack of subsidy for PhilHealth is unconstitutional and marks the first time in the country’s history that the health of Filipinos has been disregarded by the President, the Senate President, and the House of Representatives.

- Advertisement -

Dr. Leachon explained that the petition was filed because the non-allocation of a subsidy for PhilHealth is unconstitutional and unprecedented in the country’s history, where the health of Filipinos has been disregarded by the President of the Philippines, the Senate President, and the House of Representatives.

Leachon further claimed that realigning and increasing the budget for other sectors, particularly the House and Senate, was done unfairly, depriving Filipinos of their right to a transparent funding process.

Leachon explained that the realignment and increase in funding for other sectors, particularly the House and Senate, were done unfairly, depriving Filipinos of their right to a transparent budgeting process.

Instead, the respondents justified the exclusion of PhilHealth from the budget through the availability of approximately P600 billion in reserve funds.

- Advertisement -

The petition was filed amid the Supreme Court’s ongoing oral arguments on cases challenging the transfer of PhilHealth funds to the national treasury.

- Advertisement -

Latest

BTS makes powerful comeback with Arirang

The world's biggest group is officially back.

Peso breach of P60 threatens BSP’s easing path amid oil price risks

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippine peso’s slide past the...

VP Sara Duterte camp warned against skipping House ‘mini-trial’ in impeachment case

MANILA, Philippines — The camp of Vice President Sara...

Middle East Tensions Escalate After Reported Israeli Strike on South Pars Gas Field

Tensions in the Middle East escalated following reports that...

12 Filipino Seafarers Safe After Ship Attack in Iraq; Right to Refuse High‑Risk Voyages Reaffirmed

Twelve Filipino seafarers were confirmed safe after the vessel...

Newsletter

Middle East Tensions Escalate After Reported Israeli Strike on South Pars Gas Field

Tensions in the Middle East escalated following reports that Israel attacked the South Pars gas field, one of the world’s largest natural gas sites...

Ex-Pres Duterte legal team withdraws appeal request before ICC

THE defense team of former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte has withdrawn a request for leave to appeal a confidential ruling issued by the International...

Philippine Senate adopts work-from-home, skeletal workforce during recess

MANILA, Philippines - The Senate of the Philippines will implement a work-from-home (WFH) scheme and skeletal workforce arrangement for its employees starting April 6...