Petition Against Zero Subsidy for PhilHealth Filed Before Supreme Court

- Advertisement -

A petition questioning the legality of the zero subsidy for the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) under the 2025 national budget was filed before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, February 25.

Health reform advocate Dr. Tony Leachon filed the petition for certiorari and prohibition, challenging the government’s decision not to allocate any subsidy for the state health insurer.

- Advertisement -

Named as respondents in the petition are House Speaker Martin Romualdez, Senate President Francis “Chiz” Escudero, and Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin.

In his petition, Dr. Leachon urged the Supreme Court to issue a temporary restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction to halt the implementation of the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA) concerning the zero subsidy for PhilHealth.

He also requested the Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the relevant government agencies to immediately allocate and release the necessary funds for PhilHealth, in accordance with the Universal Health Care Act and the 1987 Constitution.

Dr. Leachon explained that the petition was filed because the lack of subsidy for PhilHealth is unconstitutional and marks the first time in the country’s history that the health of Filipinos has been disregarded by the President, the Senate President, and the House of Representatives.

- Advertisement -

Dr. Leachon explained that the petition was filed because the non-allocation of a subsidy for PhilHealth is unconstitutional and unprecedented in the country’s history, where the health of Filipinos has been disregarded by the President of the Philippines, the Senate President, and the House of Representatives.

Leachon further claimed that realigning and increasing the budget for other sectors, particularly the House and Senate, was done unfairly, depriving Filipinos of their right to a transparent funding process.

Leachon explained that the realignment and increase in funding for other sectors, particularly the House and Senate, were done unfairly, depriving Filipinos of their right to a transparent budgeting process.

Instead, the respondents justified the exclusion of PhilHealth from the budget through the availability of approximately P600 billion in reserve funds.

- Advertisement -

The petition was filed amid the Supreme Court’s ongoing oral arguments on cases challenging the transfer of PhilHealth funds to the national treasury.

- Advertisement -

Latest

All passengers survive Somalia plane crash

Everyone praised the pilot’s swift and calm decision-making.

CICC flags rising use of AI deepfakes in online romance scams

MANILA — The Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC)...

Carpio outlines key issues for proposed West Philippine Sea debate with Marcoleta

MANILA — Retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio...

Tarriela says he does not deserve insults from Cayetano over WPS remarks

PHILIPPINE Coast Guard (PCG) spokesperson for the West Philippine...

Discaya, Rimando seek bail in non-bailable malversation case – spokesperson

CONTRACTOR Sarah Discaya and Roma Rimando of St. Timothy...

Newsletter

Sen Tulfo pushes WPS education bill to strengthen unified stance on Philippine territories

NEWLY designated Senate Committee on Foreign Relations chair Erwin Tulfo is urging the Senate to fast-track the passage of a bill that seeks to...

Discaya, Rimando seek bail in non-bailable malversation case – spokesperson

CONTRACTOR Sarah Discaya and Roma Rimando of St. Timothy Construction have filed a petition for bail in connection with their non-bailable malversation of public...

Filipino works showcased at Luneta Art Fair in celebration of National Arts Month

The fair aims to provide artists in the country with a platform to showcase their talents.