MANILA — Col. Raymund Dante P. Lachica has raised serious concerns over the credibility of Ramil Madriaga following his latest appearance before the House Committee on Justice, pointing to inconsistencies across multiple sworn statements.
“This is no longer about allegations; this is about consistency. And the inconsistencies are glaring,” Lachica said.
CONTRADICTIONS ON KEY DETAILS
Lachica noted that Madriaga has presented at least three differing versions of his account, from his original affidavit, a supplemental affidavit, and his recent testimony, covering critical aspects such as timelines, identities and roles of individuals, and the handling of funds.
“On material matters, there is no room for contradiction,” he stressed, adding that the discrepancies are not minor but directly affect the reliability of the testimony.
‘REPETITION DOES NOT EQUAL TRUTH’
He also cautioned against treating repeated claims as proof of accuracy.
“Repetition does not resolve inconsistencies; it amplifies them,” Lachica said, emphasizing that allegations must be backed by verifiable evidence, documentary records, and independent corroboration.
RECORDS VS. CLAIMS
Lachica said his own sworn affidavit is supported by documented facts, institutional certifications, and established operational procedures, which he claims contradict key allegations, particularly those involving authority, coordination, and confidential funds.
“This is a clear contrast between consistent records and inconsistent claims,” he added.
CYBERLIBEL COMPLAINT FILED
The official confirmed that a cyberlibel complaint has been filed over the public dissemination of unverified allegations.
He warned that if proven false, such actions could amount to “reckless disregard for truth.”
DUE PROCESS EMPHASIZED
Lachica welcomed the opportunity to address the issue through proper legal channels, stressing the need to examine evidence, verify records, and test credibility.
“Allegations are not evidence. Testimony is not proof. Truth must be demonstrated,” he said.
BOTTOM LINE
According to Lachica, recent developments do not validate the accusations but instead increase the burden of proof.
“In the end, credibility will be decided not by repetition, but by evidence, consistency, and truth,” he said, adding: “The truth does not change. Only falsehood requires revision.”