The Supreme Court ruled that chat logs and videos can be used as evidence in criminal cases without violating an accused person’s right to privacy.
In a decision penned by Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez, the Court’s Second Division upheld the conviction of Eul Vincent O. Rodriguez for qualified trafficking under the Anti-Trafficking of Persons Act.
Rodriguez was sentenced to life imprisonment and fined Php 2 million after being found guilty of exploiting minors through online platforms such as Facebook.
In 2014, Rodriguez was arrested during an entrapment operation by the Region 7 Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force for offering a 14-year-old victim to perform a live nude show in a hotel.
The investigation began in 2013 after a tip from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement led authorities to communicate with Rodriguez using a decoy account.
The Supreme Court ruled that chat logs and videos between Rodriguez and law enforcement officers are admissible evidence to establish his criminal liability.
Rodriguez argued that the evidence violated his privacy rights, but the Court clarified that the Data Privacy Act of 2012 allows the processing of sensitive personal information for determining criminal liability.
The Court emphasized that no privacy rights were violated because the evidence was presented to show Rodriguez’s method of exploiting minors through online platforms like Skype and Facebook.
The decision highlights the admissibility of digital evidence in combating crimes such as human trafficking, strengthening the judicial system’s ability to prosecute offenders.
