CAVITE 4th District Representative Kiko Barzaga may choose whether or not to invoke “mental health” as a defense in response to the ethics complaint filed against him, according to House Committee on Ethics chair Rep. JC Abalos.
In an interview on Tuesday, Abalos said, “It would be up to him if he wants to interject that as a defense.”
However, he clarified that the House Committee on Ethics only has jurisdiction over a lawmaker’s actions, not their mental health condition.
The ethics complaint filed by House Deputy Speaker Ronaldo Puno and several members of the National Unity Party (NUP) accuses Barzaga of misconduct, inciting seditious activity, posting lewd content, and flaunting wealth.
‘Ghost Congressman’ remark
The committee held its first hearing on Monday, during which Barzaga reportedly arrived late, saying he was “very busy last night playing computer games.”
Abalos criticized the explanation, saying, “If that’s true, he should also be ready to face the committee’s decision. Every Filipino worker knows that if you come late to work, you are accountable.”
He added, “If we condemn ghost projects as symbols of corruption, we should also condemn ghost congressmen who show negligence.”
Abalos warned that Barzaga’s excuse could hurt his case, especially since the committee has the power to cite a member in contempt.
Should that happen, the proceedings may be held ex parte, meaning they could continue without Barzaga’s participation.
“It’s unfortunate because we are giving him the opportunity to explain his side. However, he wasn’t able to attend for allegedly playing video games,” Abalos said.
He also emphasized that lawmakers are expected to respect congressional proceedings and uphold dignity in their conduct both inside the chamber and on social media.
Possible penalties
The complaint has been referred to the committee’s reconciliation subcommittee, but both Puno and Barzaga have expressed that they prefer not to settle.
Abalos said the committee is awaiting written notices from both camps confirming their unwillingness to conciliate.
He added that in the history of the House Ethics Committee, expulsion has only happened twice, most notably against former Negros Oriental Rep. Arnolfo “Arnie” Teves Jr. for abandonment of office.
In most cases, Abalos noted, they end with light sanctions, though all ethics proceedings remain classified, and it is up to the committee whether or not to make the decision public.