The Supreme Court has condemned the killing of Presiding Judge Joseph M. Wee Sit of Branch 2, Regional Trial Court in Isabela City, Basilan, after he was shot and killed along Tumaga-Putik Road in Barangay Tumaga, Zamboanga City on November 12, 2026.
In a statement released Thursday, the Court expressed deep sorrow over the death of the magistrate and extended its condolences to his family, loved ones, and colleagues.
Chief Justice Rodil V. Zalameda directed the Office of the Court Administrator, through the Regional Court Manager and Executive Judge, to personally coordinate with Judge Wee Sit’s family and ensure the Judiciary provides the necessary financial and other assistance.
The Supreme Court said it is closely coordinating with law enforcement authorities through the Office of the Judiciary Marshals to investigate the incident and identify those responsible for the killing.
The Court said details of the ongoing investigation cannot yet be disclosed to avoid compromising the case and the safety of those involved.
According to the Supreme Court, Judge Wee Sit was born on November 21, 1987, in Zamboanga City and studied law at Western Mindanao State University.
He was admitted to the Bar in 2015 and served as a prosecutor and later as a public attorney before his appointment to the Judiciary on September 23, 2025.
Fondly known as “Anjo” by family and friends, Judge Wee Sit was remembered for his dedication to justice, public service, warmth, and kindness toward others.
The Court noted that while his tenure on the bench was brief, his commitment to serving the public and upholding the rule of law left a lasting impact.
In its statement, the Supreme Court stressed that the Judge Joseph Wee Sit killing serves as a painful reminder of the dangers faced by members of the Judiciary while carrying out their duties.
The Court emphasized that attacks against judges threaten not only individual safety but also the ability of courts to deliver justice freely, fairly, and independently.
Quoting retired Chief Justice Artemio V. Panganiban, the Supreme Court underscored the importance of protecting judges so they can continue dispensing justice without fear or intimidation.
The High Court further stated that violence against judges is a threat to justice and freedom, warning that intimidation of magistrates undermines the judicial system and affects citizens who depend on the courts to safeguard their rights.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to protecting judges and court personnel, ensuring they can perform their duties independently and without fear.
The Court concluded by standing in solidarity with all members of the Judiciary who continue to serve the public despite the risks associated with their profession.